Skip to content
Section III · Topic guide

Genetics: inheritance & probability

Section III — Sciences · a free, hand-written guide with worked reasoning and adaptive practice that finds your weak spots.

Used by applicants sitting in March & September

Your projected climb

DiagnosticTarget

Once you start, your own projected score updates after every session.

Built forMarch & September sittings·GEMSAS & non-GEMSAS pathways·Domestic & international applicants·Australia · Ireland · UK

The short answer

Punnett-square reasoning and the probability skills behind Section III genetics.

Written and checked by GAMSAT tutors — not AI-generated.

Free interactive lesson

Try the reasoning style

Section I · Humanities & Social SciencesSample question

We treat forgetting as a failure — a lapse to be patched with reminders and records. Yet a mind that kept everything could not think; it would drown in the undifferentiated noise of every moment it had ever lived. To forget is not so much to lose information as to decide, mostly without our noticing, what was never worth keeping.

The author's argument relies most directly on which unstated assumption?

Pick an option to see how the tutor reasons to the answer — not just whether you were right.

How to reason to the answer

Not quite — the answer is B.

Work backwards from the conclusion: a mind that ‘kept everything’ supposedly ‘could not think.’ That only follows if thinking means leaving most of experience out — so B is the premise the argument quietly rests on. A raises reliability, which the passage never weighs; C contradicts ‘mostly without our noticing’; D smuggles in a claim about intellect the passage never makes. The question rewards finding the hidden premise, not recalling a fact.

Genetics questions reward clear probability reasoning, not memorised pedigrees. Master the monohybrid cross and you can handle most of what Section III throws at you.

Illustration of a DNA double helix beside a chromosome.
Genes sit on chromosomes; each parent passes on one allele of each gene.

The vocabulary that unlocks it

Genotype is the allele pair (e.g. Aa); phenotype is the trait you see. A dominant allele (A) masks a recessive one (a) — so only aa shows the recessive trait.

Amoeba Sisters — Monohybrid crosses and the Punnett square.

Worked monohybrid cross

Two heterozygous parents (Aa × Aa) have a child. What's the chance the child shows the recessive trait?

AND multiplies, OR adds

Most genetics mistakes are probability mistakes, not biology mistakes — so decide which word the question uses before you calculate. AND (both things happen) → multiply: the chance that two children of Aa × Aa both show the recessive trait is ¼ × ¼ = 1/16, not ½. OR (either happens, and they cannot both happen) → add. Then check your fractions sum to 1.

When it is not simple dominance

1

Incomplete dominance

The heterozygote is intermediate — red × white gives pink. Three phenotypes instead of two, so the 1:2:1 genotype ratio is also the phenotype ratio.

2

Co-dominance

Both alleles are expressed fully and separately in the heterozygote — the AB blood group, not a blend.

3

X-linked recessive

Males are XY, so a single recessive allele on their one X is enough to show the trait — there is no second copy to mask it. That is why X-linked recessive conditions affect males far more often, and why an affected son can have parents who show nothing.

Check yourself

In a cross Aa × Aa, what fraction of the offspring are expected to be carriers (heterozygous, Aa)?

Key takeaways

  • Genotype = the alleles (Aa); phenotype = the visible trait.
  • A recessive trait shows only when both alleles are recessive (aa).
  • Aa × Aa gives a 1:2:1 genotype ratio and a 3:1 phenotype ratio.
  • Treat each parent's allele as an independent 50/50 — it's just probability.

Practise this with real GAMSAT-style questions

Free account: a timed diagnostic, an AI tutor that explains every answer, essay marking on our rubric built from ACER's two published criteria, and a plan built around your weak spots.

Start free
5 min read · Concept