Skip to content
Section III · Topic guide

Equilibrium & Le Chatelier's principle

Section III — Sciences · a free, hand-written guide with worked reasoning and adaptive practice that finds your weak spots.

Used by applicants sitting in March & September

Your projected climb

DiagnosticTarget

Illustrative — once you start, your real projected score updates after every session.

Built forMarch & September sittings·GEMSAS & non-GEMSAS pathways·Domestic & international applicants·Australia · Ireland · UK

The short answer

The high-yield chemistry idea behind a steady stream of Section III questions.

Written and checked by GAMSAT tutors — not AI-generated.

Free interactive lesson

Try the reasoning style

Section I · Humanities & Social SciencesIllustrative example

We treat forgetting as a failure — a lapse to be patched with reminders and records. Yet a mind that kept everything could not think; it would drown in the undifferentiated noise of every moment it had ever lived. To forget is not so much to lose information as to decide, mostly without our noticing, what was never worth keeping.

The author's argument relies most directly on which unstated assumption?

Pick an option to see how the tutor reasons to the answer — not just whether you were right.

How to reason to the answer

Not quite — the answer is B.

Work backwards from the conclusion: a mind that ‘kept everything’ supposedly ‘could not think.’ That only follows if thinking means leaving most of experience out — so B is the premise the argument quietly rests on. A raises reliability, which the passage never weighs; C contradicts ‘mostly without our noticing’; D smuggles in a claim about intellect the passage never makes. The question rewards finding the hidden premise, not recalling a fact.

Chemical equilibrium is a Section III favourite — and you can answer most questions with a single principle, no memorised tables needed.

Le Chatelier in one sentence

Disturb a system at equilibrium and it shifts in the direction that partly opposes the change.

FuseSchool — Le Chatelier's Principle, Part 1 (~5 min).

Predict any shift in three checks

1

Concentration

Add a substance → the system consumes it, shifting away from the side you added to. Remove one → it shifts to replace it.

2

Pressure / volume (gases)

Squeeze (raise pressure) → shifts toward the side with fewer moles of gas. Expand → toward more moles.

3

Temperature

Treat heat as a reactant (endothermic) or product (exothermic). Raise temperature → shifts in the endothermic direction, absorbing the heat.

Worked example

For N₂(g) + 3H₂(g) ⇌ 2NH₃(g), ΔH is negative (exothermic). Which raises the yield of NH₃ — increasing temperature, or increasing pressure?

Check yourself

A reaction at equilibrium is exothermic. You raise the temperature. What happens?

Key takeaways

  • A disturbed equilibrium shifts to partly oppose the change.
  • Concentration: shift away from whatever you add.
  • Pressure: shift toward the side with fewer moles of gas.
  • Temperature: raising it favours the endothermic direction.

Practise this with real GAMSAT-style questions

Free account: a timed diagnostic, an AI tutor that explains every answer, essay marking on the official rubric, and a plan built around your weak spots.

Start free
5 min read · Concept